Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Brady v. Department of Personnel

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 22, 1997Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partStein, J.

In attempting to arrive at a proper balance between the interest of civil-service test takers in obtaining review of their test grades and that of the Department of Personnel (DOP) in safeguarding the confidentiality of test questions, the Court concludes that the Appellate Division erred in holding that as a matter of procedural fairness all persons challenging their test scores must be provided with copies of the questions, their answers, and the grading standards. I do not disagree with that aspect of the Court’s opinion.

However, in my view the Court overshoots the mark and tips the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zicherman v. Department of Civil ServiceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  2. Artaserse v. Dept. of Civil ServiceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  3. Rox v. Department of Civil ServiceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  4. Brotspies v. Dept. of Civil Service, NJNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  5. Brady v. Department of PersonnelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API