Legal Opinion

Strohm v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 4, 2012No. 4D09-5278PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDamoorgian, J.

Scott Strohm appeals his judgment and sentence after being found guilty of committing capital sexual battery against a minor. We affirm.

By way of background, Strohm was previously tried for the same crime and was found guilty. See Strohm v. State, 985 So.2d 640, 641 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (hereinafter “Strohm /”). He appealed, and this Court reversed his conviction and remanded for a new trial because impermissible collateral crimes evidence was admitted at trial. Id. at 642. In addition to the issue relating to the inadmissibility of the collateral crimes evidence, Strohm raised the following…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Dade Cty. Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBASupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  3. Florida Dept. of Transp. v. JulianoSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  4. Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  5. Hoskins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ritz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API