Legal Opinion

Manville v. Karst

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri

Decided May 8, 1883Published

Action against Stockholder of Insolvent Bank.

1Opinion of the CourtTreat, J.

The defendant admits that, as a stockholder in the insolvent bank at Belleville, be became liable in the sum of §1,200, under the double-liability law, to the creditors of that bank. The plaintiff, being an admitted creditor, sued defendant accordingly. A few days thereafter, and before judgment could be bad in the ordinary course, a friend of the defendant bought up outstanding claims against the bank at a large discount, and, through confession of judgment by defendant, obtained full payment of the sum of $1,200. This latter judgment, and satisfaction thereof, are pleaded in bar to the *174prese…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. KnightSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1857
  2. Jones v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
  3. State Savings Ass'n v. KelloggSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  4. Manville v. RoeverMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API