Legal Opinion

Car Spa, Inc. v. HIGH TECH OF S & C

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 13, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

267 N.J. Super. 422 (1993)

631 A.2d 992

THE CAR SPA, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

HIGH TECH OF S & C, INC., ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF PERTH AMBOY AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERTH AMBOY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted September 28, 1993.

Decided October 13, 1993.

Before Judges STERN, KEEFE and BILDER.

Frizell & Pozycki, attorneys for appellant (Eric A. Litvak, of counsel and on the brief and on the reply letter brief).

Cole, Schotz, Bernstein, Meisel & Forman, attorneys for respondent…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Paramus Multiplex Corp. v. Hartz Mtn. Ind., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Assisted Living Associates of Moorestown, L.L.C. v. Moorestown TownshipDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
  2. Funeral Home Mgmt. v. BasralianNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  3. DePetro v. Tp. of Wayne Planning Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
  4. Car Spa, Inc. v. HIGH TECH OF S & C., INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API