Legal Opinion
Robbins v. AB GOLDBERG
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided June 9, 2008No. 07SC223PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
In this case we address the procedures for revival of a judgment that are set forth in C.R.C.P. 54(h). We hold that when a motion to revive a judgment is filed in sufficient time for the procedures of C.R.C.P. 54(h) to be completed before the expiration of the original judgment, but court delays prevent a revived judgment from being entered before the judgment's expiration, then a revived judgment should be entered nune pro tune as of a date the motion could have been decided had there been no court delays.
I. Facts and Procedural History
On December 31, 1984, judgment was entered in favor of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. OsorioColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re the Marriage of GardellaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Perdew v. PerdewSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
- Mark v. MarkColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by5 opinions
- Estate of Roxas v. MarcosHawaii Supreme Court · 2009
- e Trust Life Ins. Co. v. Estate of CasperSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
- People v. SherrodSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
- v. AuneColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
- WELLS FARGO BANK, NA., ASSOC. v. KopfmanColorado Court of Appeals · 2008