Legal Opinion

Webb v. Rachmil

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 10, 1920No. Appeal, No. 110PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal, No. 110, Oct. T., 1920, by defendant, from judgment of Municipal Oourt of Philadelphia, August T., 1919, No. 130, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Harold Webb v. Elizabeth Each-mil. Assumpsit for the recovery of commissions for the sale of real estate. Before Crane, J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Oourt. Verdict for plaintiff for $422.58 and judgment thereon. Defendant appealed.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 110, Oct. T., 1920, by defendant, from judgment of Municipal Oourt of Philadelphia, August T., 1919, No. 130, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Harold Webb v. Elizabeth Each-mil. Assumpsit for the recovery of commissions for the sale of real estate. Before Crane, J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Oourt. Verdict for plaintiff for $422.58 and judgment thereon. Defendant appealed. Error assigned, among others, was the refusal of defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Head, J.,

It is undoubtedly true that, under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania, one who is engaged in the business or occupation of a real estate broker, and who has not obtained the license required by the statutes, may not successfully invoke the aid of the courts to recover compensation for services rendered as such broker, even where there has been a special agreement providing for the payment of the same. The reason is a plain one and has been fully and convincingly stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Moschzisker in Luce v. Cook, 227 Pa. 224.

The Act of the 7th of May, 1907,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HulingsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  2. Luce v. CookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  3. Meyer v. WiestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. Chadwick v. CollinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
  5. Raeder v. ButlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sherman v. WelshSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Kenyon v. BloeserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Axler v. Forman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1940
  4. Parish v. Werner, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County1944
  5. Wills & Co. v. Lefevre, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API