Legal Opinion
Siegel v. Moses
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided February 14, 1911No. Gen. No. 15,279PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Garnishment. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Frank P. Sadler, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Smith
delivered the opinion of the court.
Siegel & Borge, defendants in error, for the use of J. Doppelt instituted a garnishment proceeding in the Municipal Court of Chicago against Julius Moses and his firm of Moses, Bosenthal & Kennedy, upon an alleged judgment for $200 recovered by Doppelt against the firm of Siegel & Borge. Service of the garnishment was had on Julius Moses only. He answered orally that a portion of the fund alleged to be in his possession was subject to a claim in favor of the Knoxville Woolen Mills, a creditor of Siegel & Borge amounting to $61.24,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hamburg-Bremen Fire Insurance v. KennedyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894
- Pease v. Underwriters' UnionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1878
3Cited by2 opinions
- B. J. Lind & Co. v. DiacouAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
- Poncher ex rel. Simplex Windshield Wing Co. v. Mohawk Auto Equipment Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1927