Reynolds v. Pixley
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Tenth Judicial District, County of Yuba. This was an action to foreclose a mortgage, made by the defendant,» Pixley, alone, in September, 1854, on a certain lot in Marysville; and making prior and subsequent encumbrancers parties.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court of the Tenth Judicial District, County of Yuba. This was an action to foreclose a mortgage, made by the defendant,» Pixley, alone, in September, 1854, on a certain lot in Marysville; and making prior and subsequent encumbrancers parties. The finding of the referee appointed in this case, which is confirmed by the Court, shows that the defendant, S. Pixley, and one Teed, purchased the lot, of which the mortgaged premises form a part, in 1853, and that defendant, S. Pixley, and his wife, resided on the premises thus held in joint tenancy till May, 1854, when the…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Chief Justiee Murray.
Mr. Justice Terry concurred.
The record in this case shows that the premises in question were formerly held by appellant as joint tenants, together with one Teed, and that the appellant lived on a portion of said lot with his family, until his residence was destroyed by fire. Afterwards he boarded with his family at a hotel in the city of Marysville. After the fire, the appellant and Teed divided said lot, and he (the appellant) proceeded to erect *167upon the half formerly occupied by him, a building, designed for stores and…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Kachigian v. KachigianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Rosenthal v. Merced BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Fitzgerald v. FernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Bartholomew v. WestUnited States Circuit Court · 1872
- Collazo v. Juncos Central Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.