Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Lusk v. Seal

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1922No. 21457Published

Appeal from chancery court of Calhoun county. Hon. J. G. McGowan, Chancellor. Suit by Claude M. Seal against B. J. Lush and others. Decree for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

1Concurrence

Smith, C. J.,

(specially concurring). A complainant, who seeks to cancel a deed as a cloud on his title to land claimed by him, has the burden of proving, not only the validity of his own title, but the invalidity of the deed which he seeks to cancel, and I concur with the majority in holding that the appellant failed to prove the invalidity of the deed here sought to be canceled, or, to be more specific, that he failed to prove that the tax collector had not complied with the provisions of the statute under which the deed was executed. In our former opinion we held that a deed executed under…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Allen v. PooleMississippi Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Clymer v. CameronMississippi Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Murdock v. ChaffeMississippi Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Weiner v. DickersonMississippi Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API