Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

ACCOSIF v. American States Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 21, 2000No. 91,395Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

11 KAUGER, J.,

concurring in part, dissenting in part:

12 I concur that the insurer's claim was erroneously dismissed as time barred. I dissent to the majority's holding that the insurer's claim for reimbursement from the employee accrued when the employee became entitled to the proceeds of the settlement with the tortfeasor. Rather, I am persuaded by the rationale of Rockwood Insurance Co. v. Williamson, 596 F.Supp. 1524 (N.D.Texas 1984). Williamson involved an injured *996worker who, after receiving benefits from an Oklahoma workers' compensation carrier, obtained a judgment against the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rockwood Insurance v. WilliamsonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API