Legal Opinion

Engeran v. City of Houma

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 7, 1933No. 1100PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LE BLANC, Judge.

Contending that their stock of merchandise had been illegally seized and their store illegally closed by the city marshal of the city of Houma, in an attempt to force the payment of taxes claimed to he due the city by another party, Thaddeus and Yirgus Engeran, plaintiffs herein, instituted this proceeding to enjoin the alleged illegal seizure, and also to recover damages to their good name and business reputation as well as for mortification and humiliation, and for attorney’s fees. The demand for damages is in the sum of $650, of which $150 is for the attorney’s fees claimed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. West Monroe Mfg. Co. v. Town of West MonroeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  2. Faucheux v. Town of St. MartinvilleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  3. Bennet v. StarnesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1853

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Belgarde v. City of NatchitochesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API