Brown v. Goord
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of petitioner that the determination finding him guilty of violating various inmate rules is not supported by substantial evidence. The misbehavior report, augmented by the testimony of the correction officer, constitutes substantial evidence supporting the determination (see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964, 966; Matter of Perez v Wilmot, 67 NY2d 615, 616-617). Petitioner was not denied the right to call or question witnesses. The record establishes that the Hearing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Foster v. CoughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- MTR. OF ABDUR-RAHEEM v. MannNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Perez v. WilmotNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Doggett v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.