Legal Opinion

In re Johnson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Habeas corpus proceedings. Petitioner applied for the writ of habeas corpus to inquire into the cause of his detention in the Detroit House of Correction. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Per curiam

This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus. The return shows that a fine of 8200 and 850 costs were imposed upon the petitioner, and it was ordered that in default of payment he should be committed to the Detroit House of Correction until the fine and costs should be paid, not exceeding 90 days. This time •has not expired.

It is contended that the costs should have been taxed by the clerk; but the common practice — in criminal cases the better practice — is for the court to determine the •amount of costs which the respondent will bé required to pay, and state the amount in the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. WallaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. In re JosephMichigan Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API