Legal Opinion
Romero v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 5, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Emily Jane Goodman, J.
Petitioners Christopher Romero and Monica Summers seek the reversal of the petition for administrative review (PAR), issued on March 22, 2006, in which respondent New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) denied petitioners’ PAR and affirmed the order of the Rent Administrator which rejected petitioners’ claim that they were entitled to a renewal lease for their apartment at 448 West 54th Street, New York, New York, at a preferential rent.
Both DHCR and respondent landlord, 448 W 54th St. Corp., submit answers seeking dismissal of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dworman v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Missionary Sisters of the Sacred Heart v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- 448 West 54th Street Corp. v. Doig-MarxCivil Court of the City of New York · 2004
- Aijaz v. Hillside Place, LLCAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2005
- Colonnade Management, LLC v. WarnerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- 218 East 85th Street, LLC v. Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court · 2009
- Rosenshein v. HeymanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2007