Legal Opinion

Ellenberg v. Arthur

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 2, 1936No. 14195PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Bonham.

W. T. Arthur, one of the appellants, operated a line of automobiles as carrier of passengers for hire between Aiken, S. C., and Augusta, Ga. Clint Palmer was in the employ of Arthur as the driver of one of his automobiles. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company became surety for W. T. Arthur in the sum of $5,000.00 in a policy or bond in pursuance of the Acts of the General Assembly in such case made and provided, which bond provided that it should be for the benefit of, and subject to suit thereon, by any person who shall sustain…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of MayoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  2. Bennett v. Spartanburg Ry., Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
  3. Ex Parte SmallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  5. Grainger v. Greenville, Spartanburg & Anderson Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of MillimanArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. In Re DuganMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. Anderson, Adm. v. CloughOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Norwood v. Atlantic Coast Line R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  5. Matter of Estate of PeggMontana Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API