Legal Opinion

Poore v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 22, 1996No. 29A05-9502-PC-42PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

Appellant-defendant Floyd P. Poore challenges his adjudication as an Habitual Offender 1. Specifically, Poore alleges: 1) he was denied his Ind.Crim.Rule 4(B) right to a speedy trial, 2) the trial court's enhancement of his sentence because of his status as an habitual offender was erroneous because he had already served his sentence for the predicate felony; 3) he was denied the effective assistance of counsel; 4) his retrial on the habitual offender conviction was barred by double jeopardy; and 5) he was not arraigned on the habitual offender charge.

FACTS

On October 20,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Kindred v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Holland v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Lingler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State Ex Rel. Brumfield v. Perry Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mickey Cundiff v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Poore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Floyd P. Poore v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Poore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API