Legal Opinion

Ochiltree v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 20, 1896PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Audubon District Court. — Hon. N. W. Maoy, Judge. Action for personal injuries. Judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.

This case is before us on re-hearing. This and the case of C. M. Ochiltree versus the same defendant, are based on the same state of facts, the *374plaintiff in this case being the wife of C: M. Ochiltree, she being injured while driving a team along defendant’s line of road; the action by the husband being for the loss of his-wife’s services, and this case is by the wife, for her personal injuries. The main facts, aided by a diagram, will be found in the opinion of the other case; 93 Iowa, 628 (62 N. W. Rep. 7). In the other case, in the district court, there was a verdict and judgment for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ochiltree v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  2. Ocheltree v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  3. Ochiltree v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pratt v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API