Legal Opinion
Warehouse v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided November 18, 2004No. 3—03—0884, 3—03—0885, 3—03—0904 cons. & 3—03—0910, 3—03—0913 consPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Slater
In these consolidated appeals, defendants Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Titan Wheel Corporation, Titan International, Inc., T.D. Wheel Company of Virginia, Inc., Caterpillar, Inc., Caterpillar Tractor Company, and third-party defendants Leslie Sorenson, Kay Sorenson, Virgil Sorenson and Sorenson’s Tire Store sought leave to appeal under Supreme Court Rules 306 (166 Ill. 2d R. 306) and 308 (155 Ill. 2d R. 308) from rulings of the circuit court denying defendants’ motions to dismiss based on forum non conveniens. Appeal No. 3 — 03— 0910 presents an issue of first impression regarding a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Feltmeier v. FeltmeierIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
- Nowak v. St. Rita High SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. PattersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Dawdy, Jr. v. Union Pacific R.R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2003
- Herzog v. Lexington TownshipIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lawrence Hess v. Kanoski & AssociatCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Bruce v. AtaderoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- Cook v. SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANYMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- Dancor Construction, Inc. v. FXR Construction, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2016
- Milton v. Boeing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.