In Re RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
District Court, District of Columbia
This document relates to All Direct Purchaser Cases.
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
Now pending before the Court and ready for resolution is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Production of Documents (“MTC”) [# 340]. 1 For the reasons stated herein, the plaintiffs’ motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
I. Background
The facts of the case are set out in In re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litig., 587 F.Supp.2d 27, 29-31 (D.D.C.2008) and In re Rail Freight Ftiel Surcharge Antitrust Litig., 258 F.R.D. 167, 168-69 (D.D.C. 2009).
Discovery in this case has been progressing on a rolling basis, beginning…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Dempsey v. Bucknell UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- United States v. Acquest Transit LLCDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2017
- Bacchi v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Coma v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.