Legal Opinion · Dissent

Woodruff v. Meade County Board of Commissioners

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1994No. 18490, 18491Published

1DissentSabers, Justice

The issue is:

Whether the trial court erred in determining that the Board abused its discretion in denying Woodruff’s applications for malt beverage licenses in 1992 and 1993.

SDCL 7-8-27 provides that “[f]rom all decisions of the board of county commissioners upon matters properly before it, there may be an appeal to the circuit court by any person aggrieved[.]” The appeal shall be “heard and determined de novo.” SDCL 7-8-30.

Thus, the circuit court should determine anew the question ... independent of the county commissioners’ decision. The court exercises independent judgment. This means that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of HobelsbergerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Yadco, Inc. v. Yankton CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Keogan v. BerghSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Luke v. Mellette CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API