Grippon v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
*246ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
In his motion for rehearing the appellant, through his counsel, has directed attention to the complaint of the remarks of one of the state’s attorneys which was not discussed in the original opinion. We quote the argument as follows:
“The defendant is a notorious bootlegger and he uses his taxicab to go to his home to get liquor and delivers it to purchasers all over Beaumont.”
Prompt objection to the argument was made and exception reserved to the refusal of the court to sustain the objection. In the bill it is recited that counsel for the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Coats v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Coates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926