Legal Opinion

Mays v. Mays

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 27, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Morris, Commissioner

—Affirming.

The appellants here, sixteen or more in number, .are sons and daughters (with their respective spouses) and grandchildren of Patrick Mays, deceased,'while the .appellees are the son and daughter-in-law; this son being of a second marriage of the father.

By the petition it was sought cancel a deed to real estate and a written contract conveying personal property to the son Otis; the grounds of attack being that at the time of the execution of the documents Patrick Mays (the father) was not of sufficient mental ■capacity to contract; that if…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schrodt's v. SchrodtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. Wigginton's v. WiggintonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  3. Lossie v. Central Trust Co. of OwensboroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  4. Bodine v. BodineCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. Henson v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Howard v. Farmer, SheriffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  2. Martine v. RoadcapCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  3. White v. HanesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API