Legal Opinion
Nowack v. Department of Audit & Control
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 15, 1973PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEmmett J. Schnepp, J.
In this action for a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief, plaintiffs seek an order restraining the defendants from purchasing premises known as 50 Brown-croft Boulevard in the City of Rochester, New York, pending *519determination of the issues in the action. Defendants have made a cross motion for judgment dismissing the complaint pursuant to CPLft 3211 (subd. [a], pars. 2, 3, 7 and 8). Their claims that the court has no jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action and of the person of the defendants (CPLR 3211, subd. [a], pars. 2 and 8), were not seriously pressed, are without merit…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gaynor v. RockefellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Donohue v. CorneliusNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- City of Rochester v. Town of RushNew York Supreme Court · 1971
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of White Plains v. FerraioliNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- In Re the Purchase of the Suntide Inn MotelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Independent School District No. 89 of Oklahoma County v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Western Regional Off-Track Betting Corp. v. Town of HenriettaNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- Group House of Port Washington, Inc. v. Board of Zoning & AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.