Legal Opinion

Coughlan & Co. v. Frankel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 7, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMabtin, J.

The plaintiff, a real estate broker, brought this action to recover $1,500 for effectuating a sale of real property in the city of New York for defendant Louis Frankel, as vendor, to Alexander Watterson, as purchaser.

There is no dispute as to plaintiff’s having been duly licensed, as to the employment, the agreed amount of the brokerage and that plaintiff procured a prospective purchaser and brought the parties together. However, they signed a binder which, though sufficient in itself, contemplated a formal contract.

The amended answer alleges a defense which in part is as follows: “ It was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Belmar Contracting Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Amies v. WesnofskeNew York Court of Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API