Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Staunton Mutual Telephone Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 16, 1922PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWest, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the State Corporation Commission, entered on the 27th day of April, 1921, requiring the plaintiff and defendant companies to maintain physical connection between their respective telephone systems, upon terms stated in said judgment.

For many years the Staunton Mutual Telephone Company, the predecessor of the Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of Virginia, which has been substituted as defendant, hereafter called the city company, has maintained a telephone exchange in the city of Staunton and performed telephone service for its patrons over its own…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. EppsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  2. Button v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
  3. State Public Utilities Commission ex rel. Noble Telephone Co. v. Noble Mutual Telephone Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Virginia-Western Power Co. v. City of Clifton ForgeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  5. Berry v. Second Baptist Church of StillwaterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of Virginia · 1978
  2. Alexandria Water Co. v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  3. State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Patterson v. Old Dominion Trust Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  5. Albemarle Oil & Gas Co. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API