Legal Opinion · Dissent

Green Quarries, Inc. v. Raasch

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 31, 1984No. WD 33356Published

1DissentLowenstein, Judge

I dissent. The majority first holds the plaintiff’s last petition was improperly drafted in that it left out a vital element of its case, and, secondly, that there is no cause of action in Missouri by a sub-contractor who fails to perfect his mechanic’s lien against a landowner. I respectfully disagree with both holdings and address the latter first.

I

The majority would penalize a sub-contractor who has failed to perfect a mechanic’s lien by foreclosing his right to quasi-contractual relief. No other class of persons or entities is denied equitable relief for such a failure. The result here…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Paschall's, Inc. v. DozierTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  2. R. L. Sweet Lumber Co. v. E. L. Lane, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  3. Laclede Gas Company v. Hampton Speedway CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Ward v. NoldeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  5. Vanderlaan v. Berry Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1970

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API