Legal Opinion

(PC) Casto v. Newsom

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 2, 2021No. 2:19-cv-02209Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HERSHEL WAYNE CASTRO, II, Case No. 2:19-cv-02209-KJM-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF 13 v. COUNSEL, (2) GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR SUBPOENA 14 NEWSOME, et al., FORMS, AND (3) GRANTING THE PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION TO MODIFY 15 Defendants. THE DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER 16 ECF Nos. 30, 31, 33 17 18 19 Plaintiff, an inmate proceeding without counsel and in forma pauperis, has filed a motion 20 for appointment of counsel. ECF Nos. 30. 21…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D. William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. Flanders v. McClanahanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API