Legal Opinion

J.H. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 6, 1996No. 95-2603PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal, J.H. correctly argues that the court erred by failing to comply with Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.165 (1995), which requires that the court advise a child accused of having committed a delinquent act of the right to counsel at each stage of the proceeding and ensure by a “thorough inquiry” that any waiver of that right has been freely and intelligently made. See, e.g., In the Interest of D.L.A, 667 So.2d 330 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); In the Interest of J.M., 601 So.2d 604 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); K.M. v. State, 448 So.2d 1124 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); R.V.P. v. State, 395 So.2d 291…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. K.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. In Interest of JMDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. In the Interest of DLADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. J.R.V. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. B.F. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. BF v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  4. JRV v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API