Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Pollard

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1898No. 7698PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from the district court of Saunders county. Tried below before Bates, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, C. J.

The plaintiff in this action, commenced in the district court of Saunders county, sought of the company a recovery of damages which he alleged became his due by reason of injuries to himself aud the destruction of a wagon and harness, caused by the negligence and carelessness of the company’s employés in the operation and running of a locomotive and passenger train of the company over and on its line of road through the village of' Greenwood, this state; that by reason of such negligence and carelessness the said locomotive and train of the company struck the wagon in which, with team of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Railroad Company v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. StablesIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Omaha & Republican Valley Railway Co. v. TalbotNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Omaha Street Railway Co. v. CraigNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  5. A. & N. Railroad v. BaileyNebraska Supreme Court · 1881

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Crabtree v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Wallenburg v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Schwanenfeldt v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Kafka v. Union Stock Yards Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Nilson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API