Legal Opinion

Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 1989No. Appeal No. 1278 C.D. 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Palladino,

Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) appeals from a decision of the Public Utility Commission (PUC) which ordered Conrail to: (1) pay the City of Altoona $15,000.00 as contribution to the expenses of repairing the 37th Street Bridge in Altoona; (2) bear costs of $7,673.08 it had incurred in furnishing construction engineering and inspectors for the project; and (3) bear the costs of right-of-way damages, estimated , at $7,785.00, which it had incurred in the construction of the project. The sole issue before us is whether federal law preempts the PUC’s authority…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Burns International Security Services, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. D & H Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API