Legal Opinion

Stephens v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

The case presents the single issue whether there was such unreasonable delay in transporting this shipment as to render the defendant company liable for the loss sustained by the plaintiffs. It is the duty of carriers to exercise due diligence to run their trains upon scheduled time. Cohen v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S. S. M. R. Co. 162 Wis. 73, 79, 155 N. W. 945. Liability for failure to run upon scheduled time is not established by mere proof of delay. At most proof of delay does no more than to place upon the carrier the "duty of explaining the cause of such delay.

The proof here clearly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Peet v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Blodgett v. AbbotWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Cohen v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line RR Co. v. Lake Region Packing Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  2. Johnston v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API