Wilson v. Style Crest Products, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Pleicones
I concur in part and respectfully dissent in part. Although my reasoning differs from the majority’s, I agree that the grant of summary judgment to the Home Defendants should be affirmed with respect to all of Homeowners’ breach-of-warranty claims. Also, but for different reasons, I concur in the majority’s affirmance of the grant of summary judgment to the Anchor Defendants with respect to Homeowners’ claim for breach of the implied warranty of workmanlike service. I dissent from the majority’s affirming the grant of summary judgment to the Anchor Defendants with respect to Homeowners’ claim…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Parkway Co. v. WoodruffTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Starkey v. BellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Gasque v. Eagle MacHine Co. LimitedSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Plantation Shutter Co., Inc. v. EzellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc. v. Platinum Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.