Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Wilson v. Style Crest Products, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 6, 2006No. 26122Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Pleicones

I concur in part and respectfully dissent in part. Although my reasoning differs from the majority’s, I agree that the grant of summary judgment to the Home Defendants should be affirmed with respect to all of Homeowners’ breach-of-warranty claims. Also, but for different reasons, I concur in the majority’s affirmance of the grant of summary judgment to the Anchor Defendants with respect to Homeowners’ claim for breach of the implied warranty of workmanlike service. I dissent from the majority’s affirming the grant of summary judgment to the Anchor Defendants with respect to Homeowners’ claim…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Parkway Co. v. WoodruffTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Starkey v. BellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Gasque v. Eagle MacHine Co. LimitedSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  4. Plantation Shutter Co., Inc. v. EzellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  5. Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc. v. Platinum Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API