Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brown v. Cole

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1956No. A-5244Published

1DissentJustice Smith

I respectfully dissent. It is my opinion that if the petitioner, Brown, had presented the matters involved here to the Securities Division of the office of the Secretary of State for a determination, he would have been advised that the transaction was exempt under Article 600a, Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes. It seems to me that this conclusion is inescapable in view of the evidence that respondents, Gould and Cole, placed no reliance whatever on any representation of Brown, but to the contrary agreed to make the loan after a careful independent investigation. The respondents concede that…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Berkey v. Third Avenue Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Luling Oil & Gas Co. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
  4. State v. Gopher Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  5. Carboneau v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1939

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API