Eager v. Wiswall & Price
New York Court of Chancery
This cause came before the court on exceptions to the master’s report as to the insufficiency of the further answer of the defendant Wiswall; and also.upon a petition of the complainants for the production of certain, books and papers referred to in the answer and in the further answer.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
If the exceptions to the first answer were well taken, it is evident the master is right in reporting the further answer is insufficient in the matters particularly mentioned in his report. It is however insisted that some of - the matters to which those exceptions relate are immaterial and irrelevant, and that the first answer was sufficient. 1 am inclined to think this was the fact as. to a part of the exceptions. It therefore becomes material to enquire whether the defendant is not precluded from making this objection by the coúfse which has been pursued in relation , to.…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Ryder v. BatemanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1898
- Robbins v. DavisU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1847
- Russell v. McLellanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1847