Legal Opinion
The 590 West One Hundred and Eighty-seventh Street Corp. v. Mink
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided June 6, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtLauer, J.
Two actions are brought by the plaintiff as landlord under a written lease, seeking to hold hable for the rent the original lessee, the defendant Harry G. Pearlman, as well as the subsequent assignees by separate successive assignments, Samuel Fleigler and Muriel Mink.
The first action is brought to recover rent for the month of December, 1929, and the second action to recover rent for the months of January and February, 1930. The term of the lease covered a period from December 1, 1927, to November 30, 1932.
The original lessee remained in possession until January 10, 1928, at which time he…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hermitage Co. v. LevineNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Holl v. LongNew York Supreme Court · 1901
- Seventy-Eighth Street & Broadway Co. v. Purssell Manufacturing Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1915
- Goodfield Realty Co. v. WormserAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910
3Cited by1 opinion
- McGrath v. ShalettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932