Legal Opinion

Personal Restraint Petition Of Arthur Lewis Dove

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 27, 2016No. 47796-3-IIPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaxa, J.

¶1 In this personal restraint petition (PRP), Arthur Dove seeks relief from personal restraint in the form *152of a discretionary legal financial obligation (LFO) imposed for his 2014 conviction for second degree child rape. Dove argues that the trial court erred by imposing a discretionary LFO without making an individualized inquiry into his ability to pay as required in State v. Blazina, 182 Wn.2d 827, 344 P.3d 680 (2015).

¶2 But Dove did not file his PRP until more than a year after his judgment became final. RCW 10.73.090(1) states that no PRP can be filed more than one year after the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. BlazinaWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of CoatsWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. CurryWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. LundyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State Of Washington, V. James Laron EllisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
  2. Personal Restraint Petition Of Kenneth Ramone AlstonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  3. In Re The Personal Restraint Petition Of Dmarcus Dewitt GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  4. In Re The Personal Restraint Petition Of Rikki Donnell CooperCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  5. In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of: Bradleigh A. HinesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API