Fuhrmann v. State
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
SCHULTZ, Justice.
The issue presented is whether the district court must appoint counsel for a pro se applicant for postconviction relief when the petition shows on its face that the action is barred by the statute of limitations. The district court granted the State’s motion to dismiss and did not rule on the applicant’s pending motion requesting the appointment of counsel. Under the facts of this case, we hold that the court’s action was proper.
On January 23, 1976, applicant Joachim Siegfried Fuhrmann was convicted of the crimes of first degree murder, attempted murder, and aggravated…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. FuhrmannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- Furgison v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- State v. MulqueenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- Brewer v. Iowa District Court for Pottawattamie CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Dunbar v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- Brian K. Allison v. State of iowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- Deandre D. Goode v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
- Wilkins v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.