Legal Opinion

Fuhrmann v. State

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 21, 1988No. 87-1419PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHULTZ, Justice.

The issue presented is whether the district court must appoint counsel for a pro se applicant for postconviction relief when the petition shows on its face that the action is barred by the statute of limitations. The district court granted the State’s motion to dismiss and did not rule on the applicant’s pending motion requesting the appointment of counsel. Under the facts of this case, we hold that the court’s action was proper.

On January 23, 1976, applicant Joachim Siegfried Fuhrmann was convicted of the crimes of first degree murder, attempted murder, and aggravated…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. State v. FuhrmannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  3. Furgison v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  4. State v. MulqueenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  5. Brewer v. Iowa District Court for Pottawattamie CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Dunbar v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  2. Brian K. Allison v. State of iowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  3. Deandre D. Goode v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  4. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  5. Wilkins v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API