Legal Opinion

Staple Cotton Co-Op. Ass'n v. Hemphill

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1926No. 25055PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.

The appellant was plaintiff below, and sued out a writ of replevin against the appellee for certain cotton, alleging that it was entitled to the possession of said cotton by virtue of a marketing agreement entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant for the years 1920, 1921, 1922,1923, and 1924. The writ of replevin was sued out under the authority of chapter 275, Laws of 1924, section 1 of which reads as follows:

“That all co-operative marketing associations organized or doing business under the laws of the state of Mississippi may obtain the possession of personal property to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bailey v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Alexander v. ZeiglerMississippi Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Schlicht v. CallicottMississippi Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Doty v. HethMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Holton v. BinnsMississippi Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Quinn v. City of McCombMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Sinclair v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Williams v. SykesMississippi Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API