Pearson v. Pearson

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoch, J.:

Appellant complains of tire division of property made in an action for divorce. The question is whether the trial court abused its discretion.

We first note that the abstract does not contain copy of a journal entry of judgment and appellant states that no journal entry was ever signed or filed. The primary duty and responsibility of preparing and filing the journal entry rested with the appellee, under the rules of this court (G. S. 1935, 60-3827, rule 49), and if the defeated party desired to appeal to this court steps should have been taken…