Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Condemnation by the City of Coatesville of Certain Properties & Property Interests Ex Rel. Public Golf Course

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 7, 2003Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Judge SIMPSON.

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion because it finds waiver of the controlling issues which were fully litigated by the parties and addressed by the trial court.

The City condemned approximately 43 acres of Condemnees’ 47.5 acre property outside the City in Valley Township. The land included Condemnees’ restored 250-year-old farmhouse in which they raised their children, though the farmhouse itself was excepted from the taking (Excepted Tract). The City proposed to locate on the land a regional recreation center, including a golf course and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Weber v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Winger v. AiresSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. New Castle v. Lawrence CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. In re Condemnation by the Township of HeidelbergCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API