Legal Opinion

Branham v. Varble

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 2010No. 62A04-1004-SC-256PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRIEDLANDER, Judge.

Quincey and Shannon Branham appeal from an order of the Perry Cireuit Court, Small Claims Division, in the enforcement of a civil money judgment. The Branhams present two issues for review:

1. Did the trial court abuse its discretion and act contrary to law when it ordered the Branhams to pay $50 per month toward a small claims judgment?

2. Did the trial court abuse its disceretion and act contrary to law when it ordered the Branhams to make repeated court appearances and for Quincey to seek five jobs per week?

We affirm in part and reverse in part.

On July 3, 2008, the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Trinity Homes, LLC v. FangIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Prime Mortgage USA, Inc. v. NicholsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Kirk v. Monroe County TireIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Mims v. Commercial Credit CorporationIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
  5. National Mutual Insurance Co. v. SparksIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Branham v. VarbleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Branham v. VarbleIndiana Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API