Legal Opinion

In Re the Consolidated Appeals of Certain Timber Companies From the Denial of Use Value Assessment & Taxation by Certain Counties

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 15, 1990No. 8910PTC875PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Appellants’ property qualifies under all but one criteria of the statute in question for the present use taxation classification. To qualify, forestland owned by corporations must be “part of a forest unit that is actively engaged in the commercial growing of trees under a sound management program.” N.C. Gen. Stat. § 105-277.2(2). The forestland must be comprised of tracts twenty acres in size or larger. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 105-277.3(a)(3). The property must be owned for at least four years by a taxpayer whose principal business is that of a timber company. N.C. Gen. Stat. §§…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Regan v. Taxation With Representation of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Utility Customers Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. Affordable Care, Inc. v. North Carolina State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Huntington Properties, LLC v. Currituck CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. In Re the Appeal of BarbourCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. Department of Transportation v. RoweCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API