Legal Opinion

Renel Construction, Inc. v. State University Construction Fund

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1969PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHarold E. Koreman, J.

Petitioner seeks an order pursuant to article 78, CPLB, permanently enjoining the State University Construction Fund (hereinafter called the Fund) and certain officials of the Fund from entering into a contract with Lovisa Construction Co., Inc. (hereinafter called Lovisa) for construction of a heating plant. A direction is also sought awarding *984the contract to petitioner. A temporary restraining order is now in effect enjoining the Fund from entering into the contract with Lovisa pending a determination of this application. Respondents Fund and its officials have cross-moved for an order…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kaelber v. SahmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  2. Kaelber v. SahmNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Margrove, Inc. v. Office of General ServicesNew York Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. George R. Whitten, Jr., Inc., D/B/A Whitten Corporation v. State University Construction FundCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API