Morales v. Rosalt Taxi Corp.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
The plaintiffs move for a preference pursuant to rule 151 of the Buies of Civil Practice. The accident to the plaintiffs, pedestrians, occurred on April 10, 1955, as the *968result of the alleged negligence of the defendants, one of which is the owner of a taxicab and the other of a colliding motor vehicle.
The infant plaintiff was confined to the hospital until June 6th, and the adult plaintiff until May 2, 1955. Both plaintiffs have been more or less confined to home since. The adult plaintiff, who is the father of the infant plaintiff, has been unable to work since the accident, and now…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Nazario v. Martha Cab Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1964