Legal Opinion

Smith v. Wathen

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 15, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeals from Union Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Carroll

Reversing on both, appeals.

W. T. Wathen as plaintiff brought this suit against E. E. Smith, Mrs. E. E. Smith, Mrs. C. F. Clements, the Illinois Central Eailroad Company and Union County, to recover damages for their alleged wrongful acts: in casting upon his land water that would not naturally flow upon it. For convenience Wathen will hereafter be styled the plaintiff and the defendants will be styled defendants.

*821In a . general way the conditions that brought about the litigation may be described as follows: In Union County there is a very fertile valley…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pickerill v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  2. Mizell v. McGowan.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  3. McCormick v. . HoranNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. Stith v. L. & N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
  5. Robertson v. Daviess Gravel Road Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wharton v. BarberCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  2. Klutey v. Commonwealth, Department of HighwaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
  3. Klutey v. Commonwealth, Department of HighwaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API