Keisha Hollis, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Defender Security Company d/b/a Defender Direct
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before Dec 19 2014, 10:32 am any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: RONALD E. WELDY DAVID E. WRIGHT Weldy & Associates KEVIN D. KOONS Indianapolis, Indiana Kroger, Gardis & Regas, LLP Indianapolis, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA KEISHA HOLLIS, on behalf of herself ) and all others similarly situated, ) ) Appellant-Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) No.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Belcaster v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Hill v. DuckworthIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Benton v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Lee v. FriedmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Hollis v. Defender Security Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.