Legal Opinion

Keisha Hollis, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Defender Security Company d/b/a Defender Direct

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 2014No. 49A04-1404-PL-156Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before Dec 19 2014, 10:32 am any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: RONALD E. WELDY DAVID E. WRIGHT Weldy & Associates KEVIN D. KOONS Indianapolis, Indiana Kroger, Gardis & Regas, LLP Indianapolis, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA KEISHA HOLLIS, on behalf of herself ) and all others similarly situated, ) ) Appellant-Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) No.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Belcaster v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Hill v. DuckworthIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Benton v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Lee v. FriedmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Hollis v. Defender Security Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API