Legal Opinion
Attorney Griev. Comm'n of Maryland v. Protokowicz
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 9, 1992No. Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 26, September Term, 1991Published
1Opinion of the Court
326 Md. 714 (1992)
607 A.2d 33
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND
v.
STANLEY E. PROTOKOWICZ, JR.
Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 26, September Term, 1991.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
June 9, 1992.
Melvin Hirshman, Bar Counsel and James P. Botluk, Asst. Bar Counsel, argued for Atty. Grievance Com'n of Maryland, petitioner.
Richard M. Karceski, Towson, argued, for respondent.
Argued before MURPHY, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, McAULIFFE, CHASANOW, KARWACKI, and ROBERT M. BELL, JJ.
2Per curiam
The Attorney Grievance Commission here seeks the immediate suspension of Stanley E. Protokowicz, Jr., pursuant to the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited17 opinions
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- United States v. Melvin R. JenningsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KahnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Rheb v. Bar Ass'n of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- Warfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.