Legal Opinion

Walton Whaun & Co. v. Atkinson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1887PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Chambers Chancery Court. Heard before Hon. S. K. McSpadden.

1Opinion of the CourtClopton, J.

When by the laws of another State, a deed to property situate therein is required to be recorded, a copy of such deed, if authenticated as required by the act of Congress, will have the same effect’ in this State to which it is entitled by the laws of the State where the deed is re*593corded. — Swift v. Fitzhugh, 9 Porter, 39. The statutes of Georgia, put in evidence, provide, that the original of a registered deed shall be admissible in evidence without further proof, unless the execution is denied on oath; and if the original deed be lost, a copy from the registry, if duly recorded, shall be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Levy & Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  2. Swift v. FitzhughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1839
  3. Vincent v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  4. Northington v. FaberSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  5. Lyons v. LongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1844

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Elam v. A. P. Brewer Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Roberts v. BrothersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  3. Beddow v. SheppardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  4. Fisher v. MoogU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Alabama · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API