Legal Opinion

Fleischli v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided July 14, 2004No. 5766-03Published

In 2000, P had a net profit of more than $ 16,000 from the practice of law. P also earned $ 13,435 from acting activities and had acting-related expenses of $ 17,878 for 2000. A "qualified performing artist" may deduct from gross income employee business expenses related to his or her work as a performing artist if, inter alia, the individual has adjusted gross income (before deducting those business expenses) of not more than $ 16,000. Sec. 62(a)(2)(B), (b)(1), I.R.C.

Read the full summary

In 2000, P had a net profit of more than $ 16,000 from the practice of law. P also earned $ 13,435 from acting activities and had acting-related expenses of $ 17,878 for 2000. A "qualified performing artist" may deduct from gross income employee business expenses related to his or her work as a performing artist if, inter alia, the individual has adjusted gross income (before deducting those business expenses) of not more than $ 16,000. Sec. 62(a)(2)(B), (b)(1), I.R.C. P contends that "adjusted gross income" in sec. 62(b)(1)(C), I.R.C., includes only adjusted gross income from the performance…

1Opinion of the Court

JACK A. FLEISCHLI, A.K.A. JACK FORBES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Fleischli v. Comm'r

No. 5766-03

United States Tax Court

123 T.C. 59; 2004 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 28; 123 T.C. No. 3;

July 14, 2004., Filed

Court determined that, for purposes of section 62(b)(1)(C), adjusted gross income means same as "adjusted gross income" in section 62(a) and thus must be computed based on taxpayer's gross income from all sources.

In 2000, P had a net profit of more than $ 16,000 from the

practice of law. P also earned $ 13,435 from acting activities

and had acting-related expenses of $…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. United States v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Regan v. Taxation With Representation of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. Maryland Savings-Share Ins. Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Barclay & Co. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API