Rogers v. Penobscot Mining Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal From Circuit Court, Rawrence County. Hon. Wiuuiam G. Rice;, Judge. Action by Burt Rogers and others against the Penobscot Mining Company and others. From a judgment for plaintiffs and an order denying a new trial, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOY, J.
Whatever merit there may be in appellants’ contention is concealed beneath an avalanche of immaterial matter contained in 869 pages, termed “abstract,” which, with some little labor, might easily have been condensed within 100 pages. For all the reasons stated in Farrar v. Yankton Rand & Investment Co., 23 S. D. 525, 122 N. W. 585, and State v. McCallum, 23 S. D. 528, 122 N. W. 586, and a great many more of the same character, the court has not considered appellant’s abstract.
The judgment of the circuit court and the order denying a new trial are affirmed.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. McCallumSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- Farrar v. Yankton Land & Investment Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cochrane v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
- Donahoe v. AdebarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- Boyd v. Kimball City Independent School DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916